Volume 9 Issue 2
Apr.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jing-sen Cai, E-chuan Yan, Tian-chyi Jim Yeh, Yuan-yuan Zha. 2016: Effects of heterogeneity distribution on hillslope stability during rainfalls. Water Science and Engineering, 9(2): 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2016.06.004
Citation: Jing-sen Cai, E-chuan Yan, Tian-chyi Jim Yeh, Yuan-yuan Zha. 2016: Effects of heterogeneity distribution on hillslope stability during rainfalls. Water Science and Engineering, 9(2): 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2016.06.004

Effects of heterogeneity distribution on hillslope stability during rainfalls

doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2016.06.004
Funds:  This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201406410032), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41172282), the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (Grant No. ER-1365), the Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program (Grant No. ER201212), and the National Science Foundation-Division of Earth Sciences (Grant No. 1014594).
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Tian-chyi Jim Yeh
  • Received Date: 2015-09-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-03-03
  • The objective of this study was to investigate the spatial relationship between the most likely distribution of saturated hydraulic conductivity ( ) and the observed pressure head (P) distribution within a hillslope. The cross-correlation analysis method was used to investigate the effects of the variance of  , spatial structure anisotropy of  , and normalized vertical infiltration flux (q) on P at some selected locations within the hillslope. The cross-correlation analysis shows that, in the unsaturated region with a uniform flux boundary, the dominant correlation between P and   is negative and mainly occurs around the observation location of P. A relatively high P value is located in a relatively low   zone, while a relatively low P value is located in a relatively high   zone. Generally speaking, P is positively correlated with   at the same location in the unsaturated region. In the saturated region, the spatial distribution of   can significantly affect the position and shape of the phreatic surface. We therefore conclude that heterogeneity can cause some parts of the hillslope to be sensitive to external hydraulic stimuli (e.g., rainfall and reservoir level change), and other parts of the hillslope to be insensitive. This is crucial to explaining why slopes with similar geometries would show different responses to the same hydraulic stimuli, which is significant to hillslope stability analysis.

     

  • loading
  • Bouwer, H., 1978. Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill College, New York.
    Carsel, R.F., Parrish, R.S., 1988. Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resour. Res. 24(5), 755–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR024i005p00755.
    Cho, S.E., 2012. Probabilistic analysis of seepage that considers the spatial variability of permeability for an embankment on soil foundation. Eng. Geol. 133–134, 30–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.02.013.
    Cho, S.E., 2014. Probabilistic stability analysis of rainfall-induced landslides considering spatial variability of permeability. Eng. Geol. 171, 11–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.12.015.
    Fenton, G.A., Griffiths, D.V., 1993. Statistics of block conductivity through a simple bounded stochastic medium. Water Resour. Res. 29(6), 1825–1830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93WR00412.
    Gelhar, L.W., 1993. Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
    Griffiths, D.V, Fenton, G.A., 1993. Seepage beneath water retaining structures founded on spatially random soil. Géotechnique 43(4), 577–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.4.577.
    Griffiths, D.V., Fenton, G.A., 2004. Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 130(5), 507–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:5(507).
    Gui, S., Zhang, R., Turner, J.P., Xue, X., 2000. Probabilistic slope stability analysis with stochastic soil hydraulic conductivity. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng.126(1), 1–9. http://dx.dSoi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:1(1).
    Gutjahr, A.L., 1989. Fast Fourier Transforms for Random Field Generation: Project Report for Los Alamos Grant to New Mexico Tech. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro.
    Hughson, D.L., Yeh, T.C.J., 2000. An inverse model for three-dimensional flow in variably saturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 36(4), 829–839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900001.
    Khaleel, R., Freeman, E.J., 1995. Variability and Scaling of Hydraulic Properties for 200 Area Soils, Hanford Site. U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, Washington.
    Li, B., Yeh, T.C.J., 1998. Sensitivity and moment analyses of head in variably saturated regimes. Adv. Water Resour. 21(6), 477–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00011-0.
    Li, B., Yeh, T.C.J., 1999. Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions. Water Resour. Res. 35(12), 3663–3674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900268.
    Mao, D., Wan, L., Yeh, T.C.J., Lee, C., Hsu, K., Wen, J., Lu, W., 2011. A revisit of drawdown behavior during pumping in unconfined aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 47(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009326.
    Mualem, Y., 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12(3), 513–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
    Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W., Erh, K.T., 1973. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgardia 42(7), 215–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v42n07p215.
    Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L., Saxtonn, K.E., 1982. Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE 25(5), 1316–1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.33720.
    Rulon, J.J., Freeze, R.A., 1985. Multiple seepage faces on layered slopes and their implications for slope-stability analysis. Can. Geotech. J. 22(3), 347–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t85-047.
    Russo, D., Bouton, M., 1992. Statistical analysis of spatial variability in unsaturated flow parameters. Water Resour. Res. 28(7), 1911–1925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92WR00669.
    Russo, D., 1997. On the estimation of parameters of log-unsaturated conductivity covariance from solute transport data. Adv. Water Resour. 20(4), 191–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00019-X.
    Santoso, A.M., Phoon, K.K., Quek, S.T., 2011. Effects of soil spatial variability on rainfall-induced landslides. Computers and Structures 89(11), 893–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.02.016.
    Srivastava, A., Babu, G.L.S., Haldar, S., 2010. Influence of spatial variability of permeability property on steady state seepage flow and slope stability analysis. Eng. Geol. 110(3), 93–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.11.006.
    Sun, R., Yeh, T.C.J, Mao, D., Jin, M., Lu, W., Hao, Y., 2013. A temporal sampling strategy for hydraulic tomography analysis. Water Resour. Res. 49(7), 3881–3896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20337.
    Sykes, J.F., Wilson, J.L., Andrews, R.W., 1985. Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators. Water Resour. Res. 21(3), 359–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR021i003p00359.
    Ünlü, K., Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W., Morkoc, F., 1990. Statistical parameters characterizing the spatial variability of selected soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54(6), 1537–1547. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060005x.
    van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44(5), 892-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
    White, I., Sully, M.J., 1992. On the variability and use of the hydraulic conductivity alpha parameter in stochastic treatments of unsaturated flow. Water Resour. Res. 28(1), 209–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91WR02198.
    Wu, C., Yeh, T.C.J., Zhu, J., Lee, T.H., Hsu, N., Chen, C., Sancho, A.F., 2005. Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges? Water Resour. Res. 41(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003717.
    Yeh, T.C.J., 1992. Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow and solute transport in aquifers. Hydrol. Process. 6(4), 369–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060402.
    Yeh, T.C.J., Srivastava, R., Guzman, A., Harter, T., 1993. A numerical model for water flow and chemical transport in variably saturated porous media. Groundwater 31(4), 634–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00597.x.
    Yeh, T.C.J., Mao, D., Zha, Y., Hsu, K., Lee, C., Wen, J., Lu, W., Yang, J., 2014. Why hydraulic tomography works? Groundwater 52(2), 168–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12129.
    Yeh, T.C.J., Khaleel, R., Carroll, K.C., 2015. Flow Through Heterogeneous Geological Media. Cambridge University Press.
    Zhang, J., Yeh, T.C.J., 1997. An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone. Water Resour. Res. 33(1), 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96WR02589.
    Zhang, L.L., Fredlund, D.G., Zhang, L.M., Tang, W.H., 2004. Numerical study of soil conditions under which  can be maintained. Can. Geotech. J. 41(4), 569–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t04-006.
    Zhu, H., Zhang, L.M., Zhang, L.L., Zhou, C.B., 2013. Two-dimensional probabilistic infiltration analysis with a spatially varying permeability function. Comput. Geotech. 48, 249–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.07.010.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1370) PDF downloads(2060) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return