|Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3) 187-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2018.09.006 ISSN: 1674-2370 CN: 32-1785/TV|
|Current Issue | Archive | Search [Print] [Close]|
On the relationship between curve numbers and phi indices
David A. Chin
Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA
The curve number and phi (φ)-index models each provide a simple one-parameter relationship between storm-event rainfall and runoff. It is shown that the curve number and φ-index models can both be used to segregate the rainfall hyetograph into initial abstraction, retention, and runoff amounts. However, the principal advantages of the φ-index model are that both rainfall distribution and duration can be explicitly taken into account in calculating runoff, and the φ index is more physically based than the curve number. The quantitative relationship between the curve number and the φ index is presented and validated with field measurements. Knowing the relationship between the curve number and the φ index is useful in that it facilitates using the extensive database of curve numbers in the more realistic φ-index model in calculating a runoff hydrograph from a given rainfall hyetograph. It is demonstrated that conventional adjustments to curve numbers can be largely explained by variations in storm duration, which suggests that variable rainfall duration can possibly be an essential factor in accounting for deviations from the median curve number of a catchment.
|Keywords： Infiltration Rainfall Runoff Curve number &phi index Storm duration|
|Received 2017-11-09 Revised 2018-05-18 Online: 2018-07-30|
|Corresponding Authors: David A. Chin|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 1996. Hydrology Handbook, second ed. ASCE, New York.
Asquith, W.H., Roussel, M.C., Cleveland, T.G., Fang, X., Thompson, D.B., 2006. Statistical characteristics of storm interevent time, depth, and duration for Eastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., Mimikou, M.A., 2007. Technical note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11(6), 1825–1829. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007.
Bonnin, G., Martin, D., Lin, B., Parzybok, T., Yekta, M., Riley, D., 2006. Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States, Volume 1, Version 4: Semiarid Southwest Arizona, Southeast California, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah. NOAA, Atlas 14. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Silver Spring.
Chin, D.A. Patterson, R.D., 2005. Quantification of Hydrologic Processes and Assessment of Rainfall-Runoff Models in Miami-Dade County, Florida (Scientific Investigations Report, 2004-1346). U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..
Chin, D.A., 2013. Water-Resources Engineering, third ed. Pearson, Upper Saddle River.
D’Asaro, F., Grillone, G., Hawkins, R.H., 2014. Curve number: Empirical evaluation and comparison with Curve Number Handbook Tables in Sicily. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(12), 04014035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000997.
Froehlich, D.C., 2009. Mathematical formulations of NRCS 24-hour design storms. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 135(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:2(241).
Fu, S., Zhang, G., Wang, L., Luo, L., 2011. Initial abstraction ratio in the SCS-CN method in the Loess Plateau of China. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 54(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36271.
Gupta, R.S., 2017. Hydrology and Hydraulic Systems, fourth ed. Waveland Press, Long Grove.
Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., Zevenbergen, A.W., 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111(4), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330).
Hawkins, R.H., 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119(2), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334).
Hawkins, R.H., Ward, T.J., Woodward, D.E., Van Mullem, J.A., 2009. Curve Number Hydrology, State of the Practice. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston.
Hershfield, D.M., 1961. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 Years. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Jain, M.K., Mishra, S.K., Babu, P.S., Venugopal, K., Singh, V.P., 2006. Enhanced runoff curve number model incorporating storm duration and nonlinear Ia-S relation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(6), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(631).
Lal, M., Mishra, S.K., Pandey, A., 2015. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number. Catena, 133, 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.001.
Lal, M., Mishra, S.K., Pandey, A., Pandey, R.P., Meena, P.K., Chaudhary, A., Jha, R.K., Shreevastava, A.K., Kumar, Y., 2017. Evaluation of the Soil Conservation Service curve number methodology using data from agricultural plots. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001311.
McCuen, R.H., 2017. Hydrologic Analysis and Design, fourth ed. Pearson, Upper Saddle River.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2017. National Engineering Handbook: Part 630/Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Ogden, F.L., Hawkins, R.P., Walter, M.T., Goodrich, D.C., 2017. Comment on “Beyond the SCS-CN method: A theoretical framework for spatially lumped rainfall-runoff response” by M.S. Bartlett et al. Water Resources Research, 53(7), 6345–6350. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020176.
Singh, V.P., 1992. Elementary Hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1986. Methodology for Analysis of Detention Basins for Control of Urban Runoff Quality, EPA 440/5-87-001. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Van Mullem, J.A., Woodward, D.E., Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., 2002. Runoff curve number method: Beyond the handbook. Proceedings of 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference. Las Vegas.
Rui Xiaofang1,2; Yu Mei1,2; Liu Fanggui1,2; Gong Xinglong1,2.Calculation of watershed flow concentration based on the grid drop concept[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(1): 1-9
|2．Sun Dongpo*1, Lu Ruili2, Song Yongjun1, Yan Jun1.Impact of hydroelectric projects on river environment: Analysis of water quality changes in Ningxia Reach of Yellow River[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(2): 66-75|
|3． Qing-yuan ZHU, Guo-hua FANG.Evaluation index system for positive operation of water conservancy projects[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2009,2(4): 110-117|
|4．Sameer SHADEED; Mohammad ALMASRI.Application of GIS-based SCS-CN method in West Bank catchments, Palestine[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2010,3(1): 1-13|
|5．Bu Quanmin1, 2;Bi Jun*1, 2, 3;Yuan Zengwei1, 2, 3;Huang Lei1, 2.R/S method for evaluation of pollutant time series in environmental quality assessment[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(4): 82-88|
|6．Ouyang Rulin*1, 2;Ren Liliang1;Cheng Weiming2;Yu Zhongbo1.Application of hydrological models in a snowmelt region of Aksu River Basin[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(4): 1-13|
|7．Deng Peng*, Li Zhijia, Xie Fan.Application of TOPMODEL in Buliu River Basin and comparison with Xin’anjiang model[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(2): 25-32|
|8．Yan-fang SANG, Dong WANG, Ji-chun WU, Qing-ping ZHU, Ling WANG.Human impacts on runoff regime of middle and lower Yellow River[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2011,4(1): 36-45|
|9．Amina R. LODHI, Kumud ACHARYA.Detention basins as best management practices for water quality control in an arid region[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2014,7(2): 155-167|
|10．Ming-wei Ma, Wen-chuan Wang, Fei Yuan, Li-liang Ren, Xin-jun Tu .Application of a hybrid multiscalar indicator in drought identification in Beijing and Guangzhou, China[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2018,11(3): 177-186|
|11．Zhi-jia LI*1, Li-li WANG1, Hong-jun BAO1, Yu SONG2, Zhong-bo YU1, 3.Rainfall-runoff simulation and flood forecasting for Huaihe Basin[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(3): 24-35|
|12．Li-liang REN*1;Gui-zuo WANG1; Fang LU2;Tian-fang FANG3.Application of spatially varying storage capacity model for runoff parameterization in semi-arid catchment[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2009,2(2): 1-10|
|13．Hong-jun BAO; Li-li WANG; Zhi-jia LI; Lin-na ZHAO; Guo-ping ZHANG.Hydrological Daily Rainfall-runoff Simulating with BTOPMC model and Comparison with Xin’anjiang model[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2010,3(2): 121-131|
Gen-wei CHENG1;Zhong-bo YU2,3;Chang-sheng LI4;Yong HUANG2,3
Integrated simulation of runoff and groundwater in forest wetland watersheds[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(3): 1-15
|15． Shan-hu JIANG, Li-liang REN, Bin YONG, Xiao-li YANG, Lin SHI.Evaluation of high-resolution satellite precipitation products with surface rainfall over Laohahe Basin in northern China[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2010,3(4): 405-417|
|Copyright by Water Science and Engineering|