Volume 19 Issue 3
Sep.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Alberto Mena, Rafael J. Bergillos, Javier Paredes-Arquiola, Joaquín Andreu, Abel Solera. 2026: Deep learning for streamflow forecasting in semi-arid basins. Water Science and Engineering, 19(3): 419-430. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.05.002
Citation: Alberto Mena, Rafael J. Bergillos, Javier Paredes-Arquiola, Joaquín Andreu, Abel Solera. 2026: Deep learning for streamflow forecasting in semi-arid basins. Water Science and Engineering, 19(3): 419-430. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.05.002

Deep learning for streamflow forecasting in semi-arid basins

doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.05.002
Funds:

This work was supported by the Spanish Research Agency and the European Biodiversity Partnership for NBSPLUS project (Grant No. PCI2025-163161) and the Spanish Research Agency (Contract No. PRE2022-102012).

  • Received Date: 2025-10-25
  • Accepted Date: 2026-04-15
  • Accurate streamflow forecasting is crucial for effective water resources management, particularly in semi-arid regions increasingly impacted by climate change. This study evaluated the performance of deep learning models for streamflow forecasting in two catchments in eastern Spain. The models were trained on historical data using a one-step-ahead forecasting approach and evaluated through temporal cross-validation. A recursive multi-step forecasting strategy was subsequently used to assess predictive performance across different forecasting horizons. The long short-term memory (LSTM) models generally outperformed the multilayer perceptron (MLP) models due to their ability to capture temporal dependencies, although they exhibited high sensitivity to the length of training data and model calibration. The MLP models performed better with simple preprocessing, whereas the LSTM models benefited from combining temporal features with deseasonalization techniques. The optimal configuration for each catchment consistently delivered robust performance and reasonable predictions across various forecasting horizons. This study highlights the potential of neural network models for streamflow forecasting and provides practical guidance for implementing deep learning models in semi-arid basins, thereby contributing to improved drought risk assessment and water resources management.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Ali, A., Raheem, A., Khidir, K., 2020. Daily streamflow prediction for Khazir River Basin using ARIMA and ANN models. Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 32(3), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.32.3.4.
    [2]
    Alizadeh, M.J., Kavianpour, M.R., 2015. Development of wavelet-ANN models to predict water quality parameters in Hilo Bay, Pacific Ocean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 98(1-2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.052.
    [3]
    Andreu, J., Ferrer-Polo, J., Perez-Martin, M., Solera, A., Paredes-Arquiola, J., 2013. Drought planning and management in the Jucar River Basin, Spain. In: Schwabe, K., Albiac, J., Connor, J., Hassan, R., Meza Gonzalez, L. (Eds.), Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_13.
    [4]
    Asadi, S., Jimeno-Saez, P., Lopez-Ballesteros, A., Senent-Aparicio, J., 2025. Coupling SWAT+ with LSTM for enhanced and interpretable streamflow estimation in arid and semi-arid watersheds, a case study of the Tagus Headwaters River Basin, Spain. Environmental Modelling & Software 186, 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106360.
    [5]
    Barzegar, R., Fijani, E., Asghari Moghaddam, A., Tziritis, E., 2017. Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models. Science of The Total Environment 599-600, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.189.
    [6]
    Barzegar, R., Aalami, M.T., Adamowski, J., 2020. Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN-LSTM deep learning model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 34(2), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00477-020-01776-2.
    [7]
    Chen, E., Andersen, M.S., Chandra, R., 2024. Deep learning framework with Bayesian data imputation for modelling and forecasting groundwater levels. Environmental Modelling & Software 178, 106072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106072.
    [8]
    Confederacion Hidrografica del Jucar (CHJ), 2022. Plan Hidrologico de Cuenca 2022-2027. CHJ, Valencia (in Spanish).es.
    [9]
    Confederacion Hidrografica del Jucar (CHJ), 2025. SIA Jucar. CHJ, Valencia (in Spanish). https://aps.chj.es/siajucar/.es.
    [10]
    Corzo Perez, G.A., Solomatine, D.P., 2024. Hydroinformatics and applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in water-related problems. In: Corzo Perez, G.A., Solomatine, D.P., (Eds.), Advanced Hydroinformatics: Machine Learning and Optimization for Water Resources. Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119639268.ch1.
    [11]
    Dibie, C., 2019. A critical review on artificial intelligence models in hydrological forecasting how reliable are artificial intelligence models. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 8(7), 365-378 https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV8IS070123.
    [12]
    Dorado-Guerra, D.Y., Corzo, G., Paredes-Arquiola, J., Perez-Martin, M., 2023a. Machine learning models to predict nitrate concentration in a river basin. Environmental Research Communications 4, 125012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acabb7.
    [13]
    Dorado-Guerra, D.Y., Paredes-Arquiola, J., Perez-Martin, M.A., Corzo-Perez, G., Rios-Rojas, L., 2023b. Effect of climate change on the water quality of Mediterranean rivers and alternatives to improve its status. Journal of Environmental Management 348, 119069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119069.
    [14]
    Feng, Z., Zhang, J., Niu, W., 2024. A state-of-the-art review of long short-term memory models with applications in hydrology and water resources. Applied Soft Computing 167, 112352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112352.
    [15]
    Ghannem, S., Bergillos, R.J., Paredes-Arquiola, J., Martinez-Capel, F., Andreu, J., 2023. Coupling hydrological, habitat and water supply indicators to improve the management of environmental flows. Science of The Total Environment 898, 165640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165640.
    [16]
    Guo, X., Zhao, X., Zhu, X., Zhu, B., Guo, Q., Wu, X., Wang, H., An, J., 2025. Comprehensive objective function-guided decomposition-prediction co-optimization framework: Enhanced transformer model for high-accuracy forecasting of non-stationary runoff. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 60, 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102482.
    [17]
    Gupta, H.V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K.K., Martinez, G.F., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology 377(1-2), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
    [18]
    Han, H., Liu, Z., Barrios, M., Li, J., Zeng, Z., Sarhan, N., Awwad, E., 2024. Time series forecasting model for non-stationary series pattern extraction using deep learning and GARCH modeling. Journal of Cloud Computing 13, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-023-00576-7.
    [19]
    Haro-Monteagudo, D., Solera, A., Andreu, J., 2017. Drought early warning based on optimal risk forecasts in regulated river systems: Application to the Jucar River Basin (Spain). Journal of Hydrology 544, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.022.
    [20]
    Hdeib, R., Aouad, M., 2023. Rainwater harvesting systems: An urban flood risk mitigation measure in arid areas. Water Science and Engineering 16(3), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2023.04.004.
    [21]
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J., 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
    [22]
    Hou, S., Wei, J., Hou, M., Xu, J., Han, L., 2025. A hydrological knowledge-informed LSTM model for monthly streamflow reconstruction using distributed data: Application to typical rivers across the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Hydrology 649(1), 132409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132409.
    [23]
    Ibrahim, K.S.M.H., Huang, Y.F., Ahmed, A.N., Koo, C.H., El-Shafie, A., 2022. A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting. Alexandria Engineering Journal 61(1), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.100.
    [24]
    Kareem, B.A., Zubaidi, S.L., Al-Ansari, N., Muhsen, Y.R., 2023. Review of recent trends in the hybridisation of preprocessing-based and parameter optimisation-based hybrid models to forecast univariate streamflow. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 138(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.027954.
    [25]
    Khatun, A., Nisha, M.N., Chatterjee, S., Sridhar, V., 2024. A novel insight on input variable and time lag selection in daily streamflow forecasting using deep learning models. Environmental Modelling & Software 179, 106126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106126.
    [26]
    Kiiza, C., Pan, S., Bockelmann-Evans, B., Babatunde, A., 2020. Predicting pollutant removal in constructed wetlands using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Water Science and Engineering 13(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2020.03.005.
    [27]
    Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Herrnegger, M., Sampson, A.K., Hochreiter, S., Nearing, G.S., 2019. Toward improved predictions in ungauged basins: Exploiting the power of machine learning. Water Resources Research 55(12), 11344-11354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026065.
    [28]
    Kumar, V., Kedam, N., Sharma, K., Mehta, D., Caloiero, T., 2023. Advanced machine learning techniques to improve hydrological prediction: A comparative analysis of streamflow prediction models. Water 15(14), 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142572.
    [29]
    Lai, Y., Choi, B., Roy, S.B., 2025. Bayesian inference of historical streamflow changes suggests further stress in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 61, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102619.
    [30]
    Lerma, N., Paredes-Arquiola, J., Andreu, J., Solera, A., 2013. Development of operating rules for a complex multi-reservoir system by coupling genetic algorithms and network optimization. Hydrological Sciences Journal 58(4), 797-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.779777.
    [31]
    Merheb, M., Moussa, R., Abdallah, C., Colin, F., Perrin, C., Baghdadi, N., 2016. Hydrological response characteristics of Mediterranean catchments at different time scales: A meta-analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal 61(14), 2520-2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1140174.
    [32]
    Ni, L., Wang, D., Singh, V.P., Wu, J., Wang, Y., Tao, Y., Zhang, J., 2020. Streamflow and rainfall forecasting by two long short-term memory-based models. Journal of Hydrology 583(8), 124296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124296.
    [33]
    Palma, D., Antela, K.U., Prevot, A.B., Cervera, M.L., Morales-Rubio, A., Saez-Hernandez, R., 2025. Artificial neural networks applied to photo-Fenton process: An innovative approach to wastewater treatment. Water Science and Engineering 18(3), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.04.005.
    [34]
    Passalis, N., Tefas, A., Kanniainen, J., Gabbouj, M., Iosifidis, A., 2020. Deep adaptive input normalization for time series forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31(9), 3760-3765. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944933.
    [35]
    Qian, Q., He, M., Sun, F., Liu, X., 2024. Monitoring and evaluation of the water quality of the Lower Neches River, Texas, USA. Water Science and Engineering 17(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2023.10.002.
    [36]
    Quilty, J., Adamowski, J., 2018. Addressing the incorrect usage of wavelet-based hydrological and water resources forecasting models for real-world applications with best practices and a new forecasting framework. Journal of Hydrology 563, 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.003.
    [37]
    Quilty, J., Adamowski, J., 2021. A maximal overlap discrete wavelet packet transform integrated approach for rainfall forecasting - A case study in the Awash River Basin (Ethiopia). Environmental Modelling & Software 144, 105119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105119.
    [38]
    Rothfuss, J., Ferreira, F., Walther, S., Ulrich, M., 2019. Conditional density estimation with neural networks: Best practices and benchmarks. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1903.00954. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.00954.
    [39]
    Shang, H., Xia, J., Hu, C., Zhou, M., Deng, S., 2025. Quantification of backwater effect in Jingjiang Reach due to confluence with Dongting Lake using a machine learning model. Water Science and Engineering 18(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.02.002.
    [40]
    Solomatine, D., Wagener, T., 2011. 2.16 - Hydrological modeling. In: Wilderer, P. (Ed.), Treatise on Water Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 435-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53199-5.00044-0.
    [41]
    Suarez-Alminana, S., Andreu, J., Solera, A., Madrigal, J., 2022. Integrating seasonal forecasts into real-time drought management: Jucar River Basin case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 70, 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102777.
    [42]
    Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M. Hosseinzadeh, P., 2024. Enhancing monthly streamflow prediction using meteorological factors and machine learning models in the upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066.
    [43]
    Tripathy, K.P., Mishra, A.K., 2024. Deep learning in hydrology and water resources disciplines: Concepts, methods, applications, and research directions. Journal of Hydrology 628, 130458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130458.
    [44]
    Uchimiya, M., 2024. Big data-driven water research towards metaverse. Water Science and Engineering 17(2), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2024.02.001.
    [45]
    Vazquez, D.A., Corzo Perez, G.A., Solomatine, D.P., 2024. Noise filter with wavelet analysis in artificial neural networks (NOWANN) for flow time series prediction. In: Corzo Perez, G.A., Solomatine, D.P., (Eds.), Advanced Hydroinformatics: Machine Learning and Optimization for Water Resources. Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 241-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119639268.ch9.
    [46]
    Wang, W., Cheng, Q., Chau, K., Hu, H., Zang, H., Xu, D., 2023. An enhanced monthly runoff time series prediction using extreme learning machine optimized by salp swarm algorithm based on time varying filtering based empirical mode decomposition. Journal of Hydrology 620, 129460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129460.
    [47]
    Wang, W., Dong, Z., Zhang, T., Ren, L., Xue, L., Wu, T., 2024. Mixed D-vine copula-based conditional quantile model for stochastic monthly streamflow simulation. Water Science and Engineering 17(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2023.05.004.
    [48]
    Wang, X., Deng, C., Yin, X., Wei, J., Zou, J., 2025. Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow in upper Han River Basin using deep learning models ensembled with Bayesian model averaging. Water Science and Engineering 18(4), 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.08.004.
    [49]
    Wegayehu, E., Muluneh, F., 2022. Short-term daily univariate streamflow forecasting using deep learning models. Advances in Meteorology 2022, 21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1860460.
    [50]
    Wei, J., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Ding, Y., Fu, J., Chen, Z., Xing, W., 2021. Drought variability and its connection with large-scale atmospheric circulations in Haihe River Basin. Water Science and Engineering 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2020.12.007.
    [51]
    Wei, Y., Hashim, H.B., Lai, S.H., Chong, K.L., Huang, Y.F., Ahmed, A.N., Sherif, M., El-Shafie, A., 2024. Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence methods for streamflow forecasting. IEEE Access 12, 10865-10885. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3351754.
    [52]
    Xu, W., Chen, J., Zhang, X.J., Xiong, L., Chen, H., 2022. A framework of integrating heterogeneous data sources for monthly streamflow prediction using a state-of-the-art deep learning model. Journal of Hydrology 614, 128599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128599.
    [53]
    Yaseen, Z.M., Mohtar, W.H.M.W., Ameen, A.M.S., Ebtehaj, I., Razali, S.F.M., Bonakdari, H., Salih, S., Al-Ansari, N., Shahid, S., 2019. Implementation of univariate paradigm for streamflow simulation using hybrid data-driven model: Case study in tropical region. IEEE Access 7, 2169-3536. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920916.
    [54]
    Yuan, S., Shi, Z., 2025. New challenges of water disasters: Mechanisms, identification, and risks of abrupt transitions between drought and flood. Water Science and Engineering 18(3), 259-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.06.003.
    [55]
    Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Sun, Z., Wang, P., Wang, B., Li, L., Wang, Y., 2024. Meta Koopman decomposition for time series forecasting under temporal distribution shifts. Advanced Engineering Informatics 62, 102840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102840.
    [56]
    Zhao, X., Wang, H., Bai, M., Xu, Y., Dong, S., Rao, H., Ming, W., 2024. A comprehensive review of methods for hydrological forecasting based on deep learning. Water 16 (10), 1407. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16101407.
    [57]
    Zhou, L., Long, G., Hu, C., Zhang, K., 2025. Reservoir water level prediction using combined CEEMDAN-FE and RUN-SVM-RBFNN machine learning algorithms. Water Science and Engineering 18(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.01.002.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return