Volume 16 Issue 4
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Charles S. Melching, Jennifer Wasik, Ed Staudacher, Thomas Minarik. 2023: Operational guidance for aeration and flow augmentation for the Chicago Area Waterway System—A case study. Water Science and Engineering, 16(4): 345-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.03.003
Citation: Charles S. Melching, Jennifer Wasik, Ed Staudacher, Thomas Minarik. 2023: Operational guidance for aeration and flow augmentation for the Chicago Area Waterway System—A case study. Water Science and Engineering, 16(4): 345-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.03.003

Operational guidance for aeration and flow augmentation for the Chicago Area Waterway System—A case study

doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.03.003
Funds:

This work was supported by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (Requisition No. 1449764).

  • Received Date: 2022-10-26
  • Accepted Date: 2023-03-24
  • Available Online: 2023-12-14
  • The Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) is a 133.9 km branching network of navigable waterways controlled by hydraulic structures, in which the majority of the flow is treated wastewater effluent and there are periods of substantial combined sewer overflows. The CAWS comprises a network of effluent dominated streams. More stringent dissolved oxygen (DO) standards and a reduced flow augmentation allowance have been recently applied to the CAWS. Therefore, a carefully calibrated and verified one-dimensional flow and water quality model was applied to the CAWS to determine emission-based real-time control guidelines for the operation of flow augmentation and aeration stations. The goal of these guidelines was to attain DO standards at least 95% of the time. The “optimal” guidelines were tested for representative normal, dry, and wet years. The finally proposed guidelines were found in the simulations to attain the 95% target for nearly all locations in the CAWS for the three test years. The developed operational guidelines have been applied since 2018 and have shown improved attainment of the DO standards throughout the CAWS while at the same time achieving similar energy use at the aeration stations on the Calumet River system, greatly lowered energy use on the Chicago River system, and greatly lowered discretionary diversion from Lake Michigan, meeting the recently enacted lower amount of allowed annual discretionary diversion. This case study indicates that emission-based real-time control developed from a well calibrated model holds potential to help many receiving water bodies achieve high attainment of water quality standards.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Alp, E., Melching, C.S., 2006. Calibration of a Model for Simulation of Water Quality during Unsteady Flow in the Chicago Waterway System and Application to Evaluate Use Attainability Analysis Remedial Actions. Research and Development Department, Chicago Report No. 2006-84. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Chicago. https://legacy.mwrd.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/MWRD/internet/reports/Monitoring_and_Research/pdf/2006/06-84%20Calibration%20of%20an%20Unsteady%20Flow%20Water%20Quality%20Model%20for%20Chicago%20Area%20Waterways.pdf (Accessed 24 October 2022).
    [2]
    Alp, E., Melching, C.S., Zhang, H., Lanyon, R., 2007. Effectiveness of combined sewer overflow treatment for dissolved oxygen improvement in the Chicago Waterways. Water Science & Technology 56(1), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.455.
    [3]
    Alp, E., Melching, C.S., Lanyon, R., 2009. Flow augmentation for dissolved oxygen improvement in Chicago waterways. In: Proceedings of World Environmental & Water Resources Congress. ASCE, Kansas City, pp. 2823-2832. https://doi.org/10.1061/41036(342)490.
    [4]
    Alp, E., Melching, C.S., 2011. Allocation of supplementary aeration stations in the Chicago Waterway System for dissolved oxygen improvement. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 1577-1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.014.
    [5]
    Ambrose, R.B., Wool, T.A., Connolly, J.P., Schanz, R.W., 1988. WASP4, A Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model-Model Theory, User’s Manual, and Programmer’s Guide, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/3-87-039. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens.
    [6]
    Apicella, G., Schuepfer, F., Zaccagnino, J., DeSantis, V., 1996. Water-quality modeling of combined sewer overflow effects on Newtown Creek. Water Environment Research 68(6), 1012-1023. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143096X128090.
    [7]
    Benedetti, L., Langeveld, J., van Nieuwenhuijzen, A.F., de Jonge, J., de Klein, J., Flameling, T., Nopens, I., van Zanten, O., Weijers, S., 2013. Cost-effective solutions for water quality improvement in the Dommel River supported by sewer-WWTP-river integrated modeling. Water Science & Technology 68(5), 965-973. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.312.
    [8]
    Butts, T.A., Shackleford, D.B., Bergerhouse, T.R., 1999. Evaluation of Reaeration Efficiencies of Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration (SEPA) Stations, Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 653. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign.
    [9]
    Butts, T.A., Shackleford, D.B., Bergerhouse, T.R., 2000. Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration (SEPA) Stations: Effect on Instream Dissolved Oxygen, Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 2000-02. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign.
    [10]
    Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., Soldati, A., 2002. Water quality control in the river Arno. Water Research 36, 2673-2680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00483-3.
    [11]
    Cha, S.M., Ki, S.J., Cho, K.H., Choi, H., Kim, J.H., 2009. Effect of environmental flow management on river water quality: A case study at Yeongsan River, Korea. Water Science & Technology 59(12), 2437-2445. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.257.
    [12]
    Di Toro, D.M., Fitzpatrick, J., 1993. Chesapeake Bay Sediment Flux Model. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer Waterway Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, Contract Report EL-93-2. HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah.
    [13]
    Espey, W.H.Jr., Melching, C.S., Muste, M., 2019. Lake Michigan Diversion-Findings of the Eighth Technical Committee for Review of Diversion Flow Measurements and Accounting Procedures, Report Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Chicago District, Chicago.
    [14]
    Even, S., Mouchel, J.-M., Servais, P., Flipo, N., Poulin, M., Blanc, S., Chabanel, M., Paffoni, C., 2007. Modelling the impacts of combined sewer overflows on the river Seine water quality. Science of the Total Environment 375(1-3), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.007.
    [15]
    Fair, G.M., Geyer, J.C., Okun, D.A., 1971. Elements of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal. Wiley, New York.
    [16]
    Harremoes, P., Napstjert, L., Rye, C., Larsen, H.O., 1996. Impact of rain runoff on oxygen in an urban river. Water Science & Technology 34(12), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00852-9.
    [17]
    Houck, C.P., Thorton, R.J., Brooks, J., Saunders, J.F., 1997. A model of alternative ways to meet dissolved oxygen standards. Water Environment Research 69(5), 948-954. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143097X125632.
    [18]
    Kannel, P.R., Lee, S., Kanel, S.R., Lee, Y-S., Ahn, K-H., 2007. Application of QUAL2Kw for water quality modeling and dissolved oxygen control in the river Bagmati. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 125, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9255-0.
    [19]
    Langeveld, J., Nopens, I., Schilperoort, R., Benedetti, L., de Klein, J., Amerlinck, Y., Weijers, S., 2013. On data requirements for calibration of integrated models for urban water systems. Water Science & Technology 68(3), 728-736. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.301.
    [20]
    Manache, G., Melching, C.S., 2004. Sensitivity analysis of a water-quality model using Latin hypercube sampling. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130(3), 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:3(232).
    [21]
    Masters, G.M., 1991. Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
    [22]
    Martin, J.L., Ambrose, R.B., Jr., Wool, T.A., 2018. WASP8 Macro Algae – Model Theory and User’s Guide: Supplement to Water Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) User Documentation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. https://www.epa.gov/ceam/wasp-model-documentation (Accessed 24 October 2022).
    [23]
    Melching, C.S., Alp, E., Ao, Y., 2010. Development of Integrated Strategies to Meet Proposed Dissolved Oxygen Standards for the Chicago Waterway System, Institute for Urban Environmental Risk Management Technical Report No. 20. Marquette University, Milwaukee. https://legacy.mwrd.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/MWRD/internet/reports/Monitoring_and_Research/pdf/UAA/CWS_Integrated_Study-Calibration-December-2010-Final.pdf [Retrieved Oct. 24, 2022].
    [24]
    Melching, C.S., Ao, Y., Alp, E., 2013. Modeling evaluation of integrated strategies to meet proposed dissolved oxygen standards for the Chicago Waterway System. Journal of Environmental Management 116, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.040.
    [25]
    Melching, C.S., Liang, J., 2013. Modeling Evaluation of the Water-Quality Effects of Separation of the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins in the Chicago Area Waterways System. Institute for Urban Environmental Risk Management Technical Report 21. Marquette University, Milwaukee. http://glmris.anl.gov/documents/docs/glmrisreport/Appendix_F-Water_Quality_Analyses.pdf (Accessed 24 October 2022).
    [26]
    Melching, C.S., Liang, J., Fleer, L.A., Wethington, D.M., 2015. Modeling the water quality impacts of the separation of the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins for invasive species control. Journal of Great Lakes Research 41(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2014.11.009.
    [27]
    Melching, C.S., 2016. Appropriate limits on discretionary diversion to the Chicago Waterways. In: Constantinescu, G., Garcia, M., Hanes, D. (Eds.), River Flow 2016, July 12-14, 2016, St. Louis, MO. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 201-208.
    [28]
    Melching, C.S., 2018a. Guidelines for “Optimal” Withdrawal of Discretionary Diversion to and Operation of the Aeration Stations on the Chicago Area Waterway System, Monitoring and Research Department Report No. 18-1. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Chicago. https://legacy.mwrd.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/MWRD/internet/reports/Monitoring_and_Research/pdf/2018/18-01_Guidelines_Optimal_Withdrawal_Discretionary_Diversion.pdf [Retrieved Oct. 24, 2022].
    [29]
    Melching, C.S., 2018b. Application of a water quality model to determine instream aeration station location and operational rules: A case study. Water Science and Engineering 11(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2017.09.005.
    [30]
    Michael Baker Jr. Inc., 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan: Modeling QAPP, Illinois River Watershed Nutrient Modeling Development. Michael Baker Jr., Inc., Alexandria.
    [31]
    Novotny, V., 2003. Water Quality, Diffuse Pollution and Watershed Management, 2nd Ed. Wiley, New York.
    [32]
    Paliwal, R., Sharma, P., Kansal, A., 2007. Water quality modeling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS. Journal of Environmental Management. 83, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.003.
    [33]
    Rauch, W., Harremoes, P., 1998. Correlation of combined sewer overflow reduction due to real-time control and resulting effect on the oxygen concentration in the river. Water Science & Technology 37(12), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00337-0.
    [34]
    Rinaldi, S., Soncini-Sessa, R., 1978. Optimal allocation of artificial instream aeration. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division 104(1), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0000724.
    [35]
    Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek Waterbeheer (STOWA), 2000. DUFLOW for Windows V3.3: DUFLOW Modelling Studio: User’s Guide, Reference Guide DUFLOW, and Reference Guide RAM. STOWA, Utrecht.
    [36]
    Todd, D.A., Bedient, P.B., 1985. Stream dissolved oxygen analysis and control. Journal of Environmental Engineering 111(3), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1985)111:3(336).
    [37]
    Vanrolleghem, P.A., Benedetti, L., Meirlaen, J., 2005. Modelling and real-time control of the integrated urban wastewater system. Environmental Modelling & Software 20(4), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.02.004.
    [38]
    Vanrolleghem, P.A., Fronteau, C., Bauwens, W., 1995. Evaluation of design and operation of the sewage transport and treatment system by an EQO/EQS based analysis of the receiving water immission characteristics. In: Proceedings of WEF Conference, Urban Wet Weather Pollution, Controlling Sewer Overflows and Stormwater Runoff. Water Environment Federation, Quebec City.
    [39]
    Wang, D., Li, Z., Rojas-Aguirre, A.F., Garcia, M.H., 2021. Impact of Lake Michigan water level rise on complex bidirectional flow in the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS). Journal of Great Lakes Research 47(6), 1626-1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2021.10.008.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (15) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return