Volume 17 Issue 1
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhengang Wang. 2024: Numerical three-dimensional modeling of earthen dam piping failure. Water Science and Engineering, 17(1): 72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.09.008
Citation: Zhengang Wang. 2024: Numerical three-dimensional modeling of earthen dam piping failure. Water Science and Engineering, 17(1): 72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.09.008

Numerical three-dimensional modeling of earthen dam piping failure

doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.09.008
  • Received Date: 2023-04-02
  • Accepted Date: 2023-09-19
  • Available Online: 2024-03-05
  • A physically-based numerical three-dimensional earthen dam piping failure model is developed for homogeneous and zoned soil dams. This model is an erosion model, coupled with force/moment equilibrium analyses. Orifice flow and two-dimensional (2D) shallow water equations (SWE) are solved to simulate dam break flows at different breaching stages. Erosion rates of different soils with different construction compaction efforts are calculated using corresponding erosion formulae. The dam's real shape, soil properties, and surrounding area are programmed. Large outer 2D-SWE grids are used to control upstream and downstream hydraulic conditions and control the boundary conditions of orifice flow, and inner 2D-SWE flow is used to scour soil and perform force/moment equilibrium analyses. This model is validated using the European Commission IMPACT (Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes and Uncertainty) Test #5 in Norway, Teton Dam failure in Idaho, USA, and Quail Creek Dike failure in Utah, USA. All calculated peak outflows are within 10% errors of observed values. Simulation results show that, for a V-shaped dam like Teton Dam, a piping breach location at the abutment tends to result in a smaller peak breach outflow than the piping breach location at the dam's center; and if Teton Dam had broken from its center for internal erosion, a peak outflow of 117 851 m3/s, which is 81% larger than the peak outflow of 65 120 m3/s released from its right abutment, would have been released from Teton Dam. A lower piping inlet elevation tends to cause a faster/earlier piping breach than a higher piping inlet elevation.

     

  • loading
  • Ali, A.K., Hunt, S.L., Tejral, R.D., 2021. Embankment breach research: Observed internal erosion processes. Trans. ASABE (Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng.) 64(2), 745-760. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13701.
    Brater, E.F., King, H.W., 1976. Handbook of Hydraulics, sixth ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
    Carlson, D.D., Meyer, D.F., 1995. Flood on the virgin river, January 1989, in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada. Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4159. U.S. Geological Survey, Salt Lake City. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1994/4159/report.pdf.
    Chadwick, L.W., Casagrande, A., Coombs, H.A., Dowd, M.W., Fucik, E.M., Higginson, R.K., Leps, T.M., Peck, R.B., Seed, H.B., Jansen, R.B., 1976. Independent Panel to Review Cause of Teton Dam Failure. Report to U.S. Department of The Interior and State of Idaho on Failure of Teton Dam. Idaho Falls, Idaho. https://www.usbr.gov/pn/snakeriver/dams/uppersnake/teton/1976failure.pdf.
    Chen, K., Pang, R., Xu, B., 2023. Stochastic dynamic response and seismic fragility analysis for high concrete face rockfill dams considering earthquake and parameter uncertainties. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 167, 107817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107817.
    Chen, S.S., Zhong, Q.M., Shen, G.Z., 2019. Numerical modeling of earthen dam breach due to piping failure. Water Sci. Eng. 12(3), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.08.001.
    Chen, Y.H., Anderson, B.A., 1987. Methodology for estimating embankment damage caused by flood overtopping. Transport. Res. Rec. 1151, 1-15. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1987/1151/1151-001.pdf.
    Clopper, P.E., Chen, Y.H., 1988. Minimizing Embankment Damage during Embankment Flow. Final Report No. FHWA/RD-88/181., Simons, Li and Associates, Inc. for U.S. DOT Federal Highway Administration and DOI Bureau of Reclamation, Fort Collins. https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB90266107.xhtml.
    FEMA, 2015. Evaluation and Monitoring of Seepage and Internal Erosion, FEMA P-1032. U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/fema_p1032_eval_monitoring_seepage_internal_erosion.pdf .
    Fread, D.L., 1988. BREACH: an Erosion Model for Earthen Dam Failures. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Silver Spring. https://rivermechanics.net/images/models/breach.pdf.
    Fread, D.L., Lewis, J.M., 1988. FLDWAV: A generalized flood routing model. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, New York, 668-673. https://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?dockey=0057428.
    Froehlich, D.C., 1995. Peak outflow from breached embankment dam. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 121(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:1(90).
    Froehlich, D.C., 2008. Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. J. Hydraul. Eng. 134(12), 1708-1721. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1708).
    Hanson, G.J., 1989. Channel erosion study of two compacted soils. Trans. ASAE (Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.) 32(2), 485-490. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31030.
    Hassan, M., Morris, M.W., 2008. IMPACT Project Field Tests Data Analysis. FloodSite Rep. No. T04-08-04. FLOODsite, Oxford. http://www.floodsite.net/html/partner_area/project_docs/T04_08_04_IMPACT_Data_Analysis_v3_3.pdf.
    Hungr, O., 1987. An extension of bishop's simplified method of slope stability analysis to three dimensions. Geotechnique 37, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.113.
    Hungr, O, Salgado, F.M., Byrne, P.M., 1989. Evaluation of a three-dimensional method of slope stability analysis. Can. Geotech. J. 26, 679-686. https://doi.org/10.1139/t89-079.
    Hunt, S.L., Temple, D.M., Neilsen, M.L., Ali, A., Tejral, R.D., 2021. WinDAM C: Analysis tool for predicting breach erosion processes of embankment dams due to overtopping or internal erosion. Appl. Eng. Agric. 37(3), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.14334.
    IMPACT (Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes and Uncertainty), 2004. Breach formation (WP2) technical report: Section 4. In: 4th IMPACT Project Workshop. IMPACT, Zaragoza.
    Linsley, R.K., Kohler, M.A., Paulhus, J.L., 1982. Hydrology for Engineers, third ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
    Morris, M.W., 2013. Breaching of Earth Embankments and Dams. Ph.D. Thesis. The Open Univ., London. https://oro.open.ac.uk/54530/1/594187.pdf.
    Pang, R., Xu, B., Zou, D., 2019. Seismic performance assessment of high CFRDs based on fragility analysis. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 62, 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9220-8.
    Phatak, D.R., Pathak, S.R., Birid, K.C., 2004. Estimation of phreatic line using dimensional analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. New York. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282070981_Estimation_Of_Phreatic_Line_Using_Dimensional_Analysis.
    Taylor, E.W., 2019. The failure of Quail Creek Dike: Lessons learned and relearned. In: Proceedings of ASDSO 2019 Annual Conference. ASDSO, Orlando. https://damsafety.org/content/failure-quail-creek-dike-lessons-learned-and-relearned.
    U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), 1988. Unified Soil Classification System Test Procedures. USBR, Denver. https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB2005106518.xhtml.
    U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (USDOT-FHA), 2012. Hydraulic Design Series Number 5: Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts, FHWA-HIF-12-026. USDOT-FHA, Washington, DC. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
    U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (US-NAVFAC), 1986. NAVFAC Design Manual 7.2 - Foundations and Earth Structures, SN 0525-LP-300-7071. US-NAVFAC, Washington, DC. https://geodata.geology.utah.gov/pages/view.php?ref=48270#.
    Vaskinn, K.A., Lovoll, A., Hoeg, K., Morris, M., Hanson, G.J., Hassan, M.A., 2004. Physical modeling of breach formation - large scale field tests. In: Proceedings of ASDSO 2004 Annual Conference. ASDSO, Phoenix. https://damsafety.org/content/physical-modeling-breach-formation-large-scale-field-test.
    Wahl, T.L., 2004. Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters. J. Hydraul. Eng. 130(5), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:5(389).
    Wahl, T.L, Hanson, G.J., Regazzoni, P.L., 2009. Quantifying erodibility of embankment materials for the modeling of dam breach processes. In: Proceedings of ASDSO 2009 Annual Conference. ASDSO, Hollywood. https://damsafety.org/content/quantifying-erodibility-embankment-materials-modeling-dam-breach-processes.
    Wahl, T.L., 2021. Methods for analyzing submerged jet erosion test data to model scour of cohesive soils. Trans. ASABE (Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng.) 64(3), 785-799. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14212.
    Wang, J.S., Ni, H.G., He, Y.S., 2000. Finite-difference TVD scheme for computation of dam-break problems. J. Hydraul. Eng. 126(4), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:4(253).
    Wang, Z., Bowles, D.S., 2006a. Three-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 1: Theory and methodology. Adv. Water Resour. 29 (10), 1528-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.009.
    Wang, Z., Bowles, D.S., 2006b. Three-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 2: Validation and applications. Adv. Water Resour. 29 (10), 1490-1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.010.
    Wang, Z., Bowles, D.S., 2007. A numerical method for simulating one-dimensional headcut migration and overtopping breaching in cohesive and zoned embankments. Water Resour. Res. 43(5), W05411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004650.
    Wu, W., 2013. Simplified physically-based model of earthen embankment breaching. J. Hydraul. Eng. 139(8), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741.
    Yee, H.C. 1987. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comp. Physiol. 68(1), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90049-0.
    Zhang, J., Guo, Z.X., Cao, S.Y., Yang, F.G., 2012. Experimental study on scour and erosion of blocked dam. Water Sci. Eng. 5(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2012.02.010.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (5) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return