Volume 19 Issue 3
Sep.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Water Science and Engineering  > 2026  >  19(3): 400-408
Ibrahim Muntaqa Tijjani Usman, Husna Binti Takaijudin, Woei Jye Lau, Yeek-Chia Ho. 2026: Comparative life cycle assessment of energy and coagulant optimisation in real and virtual water treatment plants. Water Science and Engineering, 19(3): 400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.04.002
Citation: Ibrahim Muntaqa Tijjani Usman, Husna Binti Takaijudin, Woei Jye Lau, Yeek-Chia Ho. 2026: Comparative life cycle assessment of energy and coagulant optimisation in real and virtual water treatment plants. Water Science and Engineering, 19(3): 400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.04.002
shu

Comparative life cycle assessment of energy and coagulant optimisation in real and virtual water treatment plants

doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2026.04.002

  • a. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia;

  • b. Agricultural and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bayero University Kano, Kano 700241, Nigeria;

  • c. Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia

  • Received Date: 2025-05-20
  • Accepted Date: 2026-04-09
    Abstract
  • Conventional water treatment plants depend on aging pumps, energy-intensive equipment, non-renewable energy sources, and chemical coagulants, significantly contributing to environmental degradation and climate change. This study conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of four conventional water treatment plant scenarios: one real plant and three virtual plant models. The first virtual plant incorporated energy consumption optimisation, the second substituted only the coagulant, and the third integrated both energy optimisation and coagulant substitution. The real plant, with a treatment capacity of 3.15 m3/s, served as the baseline. Using the openLCA 2.3.0 and the Centrum voor Milieuwetenschappen Leiden (CML) v4.8 method, environmental impacts were assessed for treating a cubic metre of water. The results showed that virtual plant 3 significantly reduced environmental impacts by up to 85.49% compared to the real plant in the impact category of metal/mineral resources. The average carbon footprint for treating 1 m3 of water decreased from 0.492 kg of CO2 equivalent (CO2-eq) for the real plant to 0.237 kg of CO2-eq for virtual plant 3, representing a 51.83% reduction. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the assumptions. These findings highlight the potential for sustainable practices in water treatment, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action).

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(36)
  • [1]
    Acero, A.P., Rodriguez, C., Ciroth, A., 2017. LCIA Methods - Impact Assessment Methods in Life Cycle Assessment and Their Impact Categories. Green Delta, Berlin. https://nexus.openlca.org/ws/files/10551.
    [2]
    Amer, W.M., Moawad, A.K., Hassouna, M.S.E., 2025. Life cycle assessment of three drinking water treatment technologies reflecting their economic significance. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 236, 869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-025-08453-6.
    [3]
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2019. Standard Practice for Coagulation-Flocculation Jar Test of Water, D2035-19. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2035-19.
    [4]
    Baltrocchi, A.P.D., Carnevale, M.M., Katsoyiannis, I.A., Tolkou, A.K., Maggi, L., Rada, E.C., Torretta, V., 2024. Assessment of environmental sustainability of drinking water treatments for arsenic removal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 211, 107878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107878.
    [5]
    Barjoveanu, G., Teodosiu, C., Gilca, A.-F., Roman, I., Fiore, S., 2019. Environmental performance evaluation of a drinking water treatment plant: A life cycle assessment perspective. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 18(2), 513-522.
    [6]
    Bonton, A., Bouchard, C., Barbeau, B., Jedrzejak, S., 2012. Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants. Desalination 284, 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.035.
    [7]
    Bukhary, S., Batista, J., Ahmad, S., 2019. An analysis of energy consumption and the use of renewables for a small drinking water treatment plant. Water 12(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010028.
    [8]
    Corominas, L., Byrne, D.M., Guest, J.S., Hospido, A., Roux, P., Shaw, A., Short, M.D., 2020. The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. Water Research 184, 116058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116058.
    [9]
    Garfi, M., Cadena, E., Sanchez-Ramos, D., Ferrer, I., 2016. Life cycle assessment of drinking water: Comparing conventional water treatment, reverse osmosis and mineral water in glass and plastic bottles. Journal Cleaner Production 137, 997-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.218.
    [10]
    Hamawand, I., 2023. Energy consumption in water and wastewater treatment industry-Optimisation potentials. Energies 16(5), 2433. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052433.
    [11]
    International Standard Organisation (ISO), 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. ISO, Geneva. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/fd15a9a8-acf5-491d-9fd1-b158c07376c1/iso-14040-2006.
    [12]
    International Standard Organisation (ISO), 2006b. Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. ISO, Geneva. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/b3d74118-4c9f-4f3e-b556-11d704441abb/iso-14044-2006
    [13]
    Karnaningroem, N., Anggraeni, D.R., 2021. Study of life cycle assessment (LCA) on water treatment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 799(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/799/1/012036.
    [14]
    Lakho, F.H., Qureshi, A., Igodt, W., Le, H.Q., Depuydt, V., Rousseau, D.P.L., Van Hulle, S.W.H, 2022. Life cycle assessment of two decentralised water treatment systems combining a constructed wetland and a membrane-based drinking water production system. Resource Conservation and Recycling 178, 106104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106104.
    [15]
    Li, Z., Li, J., Cao, Z., Hu, K., Ao, R., Li, J., Li, J., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Yan, Y., et al., 2025a. Spatiotemporal carbon footprints of electricity production and consumption in China. Cell Reports Sustainability 2(11), 100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100466.
    [16]
    Li, Z., Wang, X., Hu, K., Ao, R., Li, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, S., Li, M., Peng, L., Xie, K., et al., 2025b. Low-carbon transition of China’s monocrystalline module and its global contributions. iScience 28(8), 113079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113079.
    [17]
    Lui, J., Lee, S., Sloan, W.T., You, S., 2024. Life cycle assessment of drinking water and wastewater treatment works in mainland Scotland. Science of The Total Environment 958, 177989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177989.
    [18]
    Maziotis, A., Molinos-Senante, M., 2024. Understanding energy performance in drinking water treatment plants using the efficiency analysis tree approach. npj Clean Water 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-024-00307-8.
    [19]
    Mohamed-Zine, M.B., Hamouche, A., Krim, L., 2013. The study of potable water treatment process in Algeria (Boudouaou Station) by the application of life cycle assessment (LCA). Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-11-37.
    [20]
    Movassagh, I.B., Asadollahfardi, G., Delnavaz, M., 2025. Life cycle assessment of anaerobic-anoxic-oxic and extended aeration of the activated sludge treatment system for urban wastewater treatment: A case study in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability 27, 28397-28419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04846-5.
    [21]
    Ouattara, A., Azhaari, R.N.N., Hum A.H., Kuo, C.-H., Huang, H., 2024. Comparative life cycle assessment study on carbon footprint of water treatment plants: Case study of Indonesia and Taiwan. Sustainability 16(19), 8409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198409.
    [22]
    Radovic, S., Sekulic, M.T., Agarski, B., Pap, S., Vukelic, D., Budak, I., Prodanovic, J., 2022. Life cycle assessment of new bio-based coagulant production for sustainable wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 20(7), 7433-7462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04440-0.
    [23]
    Ribera, G., Clarens, F., Martinez-Llado, X., Jubany, I., Marti, V., Rovira, M., 2014. Life cycle and human health risk assessments as tools for decision making in the design and implementation of nanofiltration in drinking water treatment plants. Science of The Total Environment 466-467, 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.085.
    [24]
    Rodriguez-Chueca, J., Banuelos, A.C., Rodriguez, J.P., 2024. Life cycle assessment to evaluate the integral water cycle in industrial supply: A real case study. Science of The Total Environment 931, 172891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172891.
    [25]
    Rybaczewska-Blazejowska, M., Jezierski, D., 2024. Comparison of ReCiPe 2016, ILCD 2011, CML-IA baseline and IMPACT 2002+ LCIA methods: A case study based on the electricity consumption mix in Europe. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 29(10), 1799-1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02326-6.
    [26]
    Saad, A., Elginoz, N., Babuna, F.G., Iskender, G., 2019. Life cycle assessment of a large water treatment plant in Turkiye. Environmental Science Pollution Research 26, 14823-14834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3826-9.
    [27]
    Sharaai, A.H., Mahmood, N.Z., Sulaiman, A.H., 2010. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of potable water production in Malaysia: A comparison among different technologies used in water treatment plants. EnvironmentAsia 3(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2010.13.
    [28]
    Shiu, H.Y., Lee, M., Lin, Z.E., Chiueh, P.T., 2023. Dynamic life cycle assessment for water treatment implications. Science of The Total Environment 860, 160224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160224.
    [29]
    Spindler, C., Ciroth, A., 2024. Ecoinvent 3.10 Implementation in OpenLCA. Ecoinvent, Berlin. https://ecoinvent.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Change-Report-v3.10.pdf.
    [30]
    Tenaga Nasional Berhad, 2006. Tariff Book, Malaysia Electricity Tariff. Tenaga Nasional Berhad, Selangor.
    [31]
    Tow, E.W., Hartman, A.L., Jaworowski, A., Zucker, I., Kum, S., AzadiAghdam, M., Blatchley III, E.R., Achilli, A., Gu, H., Urper, G.M., et al., 2021. Modelling the energy consumption of potable water reuse schemes. Water Research X 13, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100126.
    [32]
    United Nations, 2023. Towards a rescue plan for people and planet. In: The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. United Nations, New York.
    [33]
    Usman, I.M.T., Ho, Y.-C., Lam, M.-K., Show, P.-L., Sujarwo, W., 2023. Continuous-flow grafting of LENFLOC™ coagulant for water treatment toward circular economy. Water 15(13), 2484. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132484.
    [34]
    Wang, D., Guo, F., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Wu, G., 2018. Technical, economic and environmental assessment of coagulation/filtration tertiary treatment processes in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 170, 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.231.
    [35]
    Xu, H., Fu, G., Ye, Q., Lyu, M., Yan, X., 2024. Life cycle environmental impacts of urban water systems in China. Water Research 266, 122350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122350.
    [36]
    Zhang, P., Ma, B., Zheng, G., Li, F., Zhang, W., Gu, J., Liu, Z., Li, K., Wang, H., 2023. Unveiling the greenhouse gas emissions of the drinking water treatment plant throughout the construction and operation stages based on life cycle assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 272, 116043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116043.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (6) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009 Editorial office of Water Science and Engineering 苏ICP备12023610号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd   support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return